Turbo Cancer: Rapid Progression of Lymphoma After C0\/lD Booster
by Jeffrey Dach MD
A 31 year old male with a diagnosis of B-Cell lymphoma called my office to ask me for a second opinion. His oncologist scheduled a series of chemotherapy treatments to treat the lymphoma, however before starting the chemotherapy, the oncologist insisted the patient should receive two Pfizer C0\/lD vaccine shots, explaining the C0\/lD vaccine shots would “protect the patient during chemotherapy”.
A quick review of the medical literature turned up a number of troubling case reports of “turbo cancers” after C0\/lD vaccination. These are rapidly progressing cancers in young people after receiving a booster shot. These turbo cancers were first reported as hematologic cancers such as lymphomas and leukemias arising shortly after C0\/lD vaccination. We now have case reports of virtually all other cancers arising shortly after C0\/lD vaccination. The mechanism is disturbance of the cancer surveillance function of our immune system, as described in 2022 by Dr Stephanie Seneff. The C0\/lD vaccine causes obstruction of Type I interferon signaling pathways, thereby interfereing with cancer surveillance.(32-36)
Contamination with Plasmid DNA
On April 2023, Michael Palmer, MD and Jonathan Gilthorpe discusses the dangers of insertional mutagenesis and induction of malignancy from massive vaccine contamination with plasmid DNA, writing:
Recent studies by Kevin McKernan, a leading expert in sequencing methods for DNA and RNA, have revealed that batches of the modified mRNA vaccines produced by both Pfizer and Moderna contain a high proportion of contaminating bacterial DNA. In all, the DNA accounts for up to 20-35% of the nucleic acids contained in each of the vaccine batches. These alarmingly high concentrations far exceed the levels deemed safe by standard-setting organizations such as the European Medicines Agency (EMA).
Conclusion: The presence of contaminating plasmid DNA in Pfizer’s and Moderna’s mRNA vaccines entails severe health risks, in addition to those which were already known and understood. Preeminent among these risks are the prolonged expression of spike protein, which may lead to correspondingly prolonged and more destructive autoimmune-like inflammation, and the induction of malignant disease after chromosomal integration of the plasmid DNA. Furthermore, the sheer scale of the contamination proves conclusively that the manufacturers have not mastered or properly implemented the designed production processes. Each of these issues alone would be reason enough to demand the immediate withdrawal of these vaccines. (40)
Moderna Patent on Dangers of Insertional Mutagenesis
Moderna’s patent for the mRNA vaccine contains a statement about the dangers of insertional mutagenesis from excessive plasmid DNA contamination in the vaccine. Here is the relevant quote from Moderna’s patent US10702600B1 (Betacoronavirus mRNA vaccine Patent, Current Assignee ModernaTx Inc ):
The direct injection of genetically engineered DNA (e.g., naked plasmid DNA) into a living host results in a small number of its cells directly producing an antigen, resulting in a protective immunological response. With this technique, however, comes potential problems, including the possibility of insertional mutagenesis, which could lead to the activation of oncogenes or the inhibition of tumor suppressor genes. (41)
My advice to the young man with lymphoma was to respectfully decline the C0\/lD shots. In my opinion, the risk of rapid progression, or turbo cancer, is too great. Above Header image: courtesy of Dr Serge Goldman and Frontiers in Medicine 8 (2021): 2409. (1)
A Case Report of Turbo Cancer: Lymphoma
The patient is a 66 year old man who presented with lymphoma 5 months after two Pfizer C0\/lD vaccine shots. See Left Image: PET Scan, labeled September 8, shows extensive increased tracer uptake within malignant lymph nodes in cervical, axillary and peri-aortic lymph node chains.
At the time, the oncologist did not realize any connection between the two Pfizer shots and the patient’s lymphoma. The oncologists were planning to start chemotherapy, and in preparation decided to give the patient a C0\/lD booster shot to protect him during chemotherapy. See vertical up arrow dated September 22. Within a few days after this shot, the patient felt his lymph nodes in the neck rapidly enlarging. The doctors ordered another PET scan, September 30, eight days after the Pfizer booster shot. To their horror, the final scan shows very rapid progression of lymphoma (ie “explosion”), with rapid growth as well as extensive spread of new lesions (See Right Image). This was the first example of a “Turbo Cancer” after C0\/lD vaccination published in the medical literature by Dr. Serge Goldman in 2021. (1)
There have been many case reports published in the medical literature since this first one. (2-7) (37)
Mouse Study
In 2023, Dr. Sander studied a group of 14 mice vaccianted with two doses of mRNA C0\/lD vaccine. Dr. Sander reported one of the 14 mice developed B-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma following the C0\/lD booster, (the third shot). (30)
Dr. William Makis Discusses Turbo Cancer After C0\/lD Vaccination: Interview on the Highwire with Del Bigtree, September 22, 2023.
Dr. Harvey Risch discusses Turbo Cancers After C0\/lD \/accination:
Should Anyone Take the New C0\/lD mRNA Booster (Monovalent XBB.1.5
BNT162b2) FDA approved September 11, 2023 ?
September 13, 2023: Dr. Joseph Ladapo, the Surgeon General for the State of Florida issued guidance advising against taking the new Covid Booster, citing absence of human clinical trials showing safety or efficacy. View a pdf of this Guidance by Clicking Here on this Link. (29)
As mentioned above, there were no premarket human clinical trials, the only study was in mice in groups of 10, i.e. Female Balb/c mice (10 per group). Yet, this new Pfizer C0\/lD vaccine was given FDA approval September 11. (26)
Surgeon General Dr. Ladapo cites many C0\/lD mRNA vaccine studies around the globe showing negative vaccine efficacy. (27-28)
Negative efficacy means the vaccine increases ones risk for contracting C0\/lD-19, not decreases it. The C0\/lD \/accine also increases the risk of myocarditis associated with persistence of spike protein circulating in the blood stream for up to six months after the shot. (10-25)
Myocarditis After C0\/lD \/accine
Same patient before and after C0\/lD \/accine.
PET SCAN IMAGING: Left Image Before C0\/lD \/accine, Green Arrow shows normal myocardial tracer uptake.
Right Image After C0\/lD \/accine. Read Arrow shows intense increased uptake in myocardium indicating myocarditis.
Left Image Courtesy of Nakahara, Takehiro, et al. “Assessment of Myocardial 18F-FDG Uptake at PET/CT in Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2-vaccinated and Nonvaccinated Patients.” Radiology 308.3 (2023): e230743.(38)
====================================
========================================
Florida's Surgeon General slams the new, untested mRNA vaccine:
“There’s essentially no evidence for it. There’s been no clinical trial done in human beings showing that it benefits people. There's been no clinical trial showing that it is a safe product for people…” pic.twitter.com/iefab6VPqZ
— Rebel News Canada (@RebelNews_CA) September 7, 2023
40% of Lymphoma Patients Do Not Respond To C0\/lD Vaccination
Returning to our young man with lymphoma, one might question the use of any vaccine, since lymphoma patients have disturbed immune function and may not mount an immune response to vaccination. In 2021, Dr. Eric Matthew Jurgens studied immune response to vaccination in lymphoma patients finding about 40 % have no immune response at all to the C0\/lD \/accine. Those under treatment with CD-20 antibodies fail to respond at all. In other words, the vaccine is a “dud” for these patients. In addition to the risk of inducing rapid progression of lymphoma after vaccination, this lack of immune response to the vaccine is another reason to avoid the vaccine as a preventive measure. In the event of viral illness, highly effective early treatment protocols are available with Ivermectin. Hydroxychloroquine, zinc, budesonide inhaler, monoclonal antibodies etc. Dr. Eric Matthew Jurgens writes:
In conclusion, we found that most lymphoma patients respond to vaccination with an mRNA‐based C0\/lD ‐19 \/accine, but a substantial fraction (>40%) do not and therefore may remain at risk of infection and disease…Our results are particularly concerning for patients on anti‐CD20 mAb [monoclonal antibody] therapy, given that no patients who had received treatment within 6 months responded well to mRNA vaccination. (31)
Just Another “Bad Vaccine”
Over the years, we have seen a number of “bad vaccines” introduced and then later pulled from the market. The C0\/lD vaccine is another one of these “bad vaccines” which should have been pulled from the market a long time ago. They are not safe and they are not effective. Stay away.
=================================================
Cracking Cancer Toolkit by Jeffrey Dach MD
If you liked this article, you might like my new book, Cracking Cancer Toolkit. (see left image)
Link to join our Facebook Group for Cracking Cancer Toolkit book.
==================================================
Jeffrey Dach MD
7450 Griffin Road, Suite 190
Davie, Fl 33314
954-792-4663
my blog: www.jeffreydachmd.com
Natural Thyroid Toolkit by Jeffrey Dach MD
Cracking Cancer Toolkit by Jeffrey Dach MD
Heart Book by Jeffrey Dach MD
Articles with Related Interest:
Watch the entire 2 hour episode on the Highwire with Del Bigtree, Dr. Joseph Ladapo and Dr. William Makis : Episode 338: TURBO TROUBLE
Dr. Peter McCullough on Ivermectin and C0\/id Vaccines
Explaining Damar Hamlin Cardiac Arrest on Field
C0\/id Vaccines, a time for Re-Assessment
Director of CDC, Rochelle Walensky Warns of ADE, Antibody Dependent Enhancement From Israel Data.
Israel Should Stop Ṗẝiẕḗr and Start l\/ḗrmḗctin Distribution
The C0\/ld Vaccine is Safe and Effective ?
Could the C0\/id Vaccine be the Next Vioxx ?
Ivermectin for C0\/ld, The Failure of American Medicine
Ivermectin Antiparasitic Anticancer Antiviral Wonder Drug
Links and references:
1) Goldman, Serge, et al. “Rapid progression of angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma following BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine booster shot: a case report.” Frontiers in Medicine 8 (2021): 2409.
2) Sekizawa, Akinori, et al. “Rapid progression of marginal zone B-cell lymphoma after C0\/lD -19 \/accination (BNT162b2): A case report.” Frontiers in medicine 9 (2022): 963393.
3) Sekizawa, Akinori, et al. “Rapid progression of marginal zone B-cell lymphoma after C0\/lD -vaccination (BNTb): A case report.” The effect of C0\/lD -19 on hematological disease diagnosis, management and outcomes (2023): 26.
4) Eens, Sander, et al. “B-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma following intravenous BNT162b2 mRNA booster in a BALB/c mouse: A case report.” Frontiers in Oncology 13 (2023).
5) Cavanna, Luigi, et al. “Non-Hodgkin lymphoma developed shortly after mRNA C0\/lD-19 vaccination: report of a case and review of the literature.” Medicina 59.1 (2023): 157.
6) Zamfir, Maria-Alexandra, et al. “Hematologic malignancies diagnosed in the context of the mRNA C0\/lD-19 vaccination campaign: a report of two cases.” Medicina 58.7 (2022): 874.
7) Ang, Shy-Yau, Yi-Fang Huang, and Chung-Ta Chang. “Ph-Positive B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Occurring after Receipt of Bivalent SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine Booster: A Case Report.” Medicina 59.3 (2023).
8) Jiang, Hui, and Ya-Fang Mei. “SARS–CoV–2 spike impairs DNA damage repair and inhibits V (D) J recombination in vitro.” Viruses 13.10 (2021): 2056.
9) Were Lab Animals Killed After mRNA Vaccination Trials to Hide Long-Term Adverse Consequences? Scientists could follow test animals for a while post-vaccination, to keep humans safe – but they chose not to Igor Chudov Jun 28, 2023
10) Yonker, Lael M., et al. “Circulating spike protein detected in post–C0\/lD-19 mRNA vaccine myocarditis.” Circulation 147.11 (2023): 867-876.
11) Forte, Elvira. “Circulating spike protein may contribute to myocarditis after C0\/lD-19 vaccination.” Nature Cardiovascular Research 2.2 (2023): 100-100.
12) Aye, Yin Nwe, et al. “Acute myocardial infarction and myocarditis following C0\/lD-19 vaccination.” QJM: An International Journal of Medicine 116.4 (2023): 279-283.
13) Amodio, Donato, et al. “Relapsing myocarditis following initial recovery of post C0\/lD-19 vaccination in two adolescent males–Case reports.” Vaccine: X 14 (2023): 100318.
14) Fatima, Maurish, et al. “Development of myocarditis and pericarditis after C0\/lD‐19 vaccination in children and adolescents: a systematic review.” Clinical Cardiology 46.3 (2023): 243-259.
15) Knudsen, Benjamin, and Vinay Prasad. “C0\/lD‐19 vaccine induced myocarditis in young males: A systematic review.” European Journal of Clinical Investigation 53.4 (2023): e13947.
16) Sim, Ju-Young, Seung-Yun Kim, and Eun-Kyoung Kim. “The incidence and clinical characteristics of myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA-based C0\/lD-19 vaccination in Republic of Korea adolescents from July 2021 to September 2022.” Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives 14.2 (2023): 76.
17) Mehta, Karina, et al. “C0\/lD vaccine-associated myocarditis in an 8-year-old patient.” Cardiology in the Young 33.2 (2023): 334-335.
18) Witberg, Guy, et al. “Myocarditis after C0\/lD-19 vaccination in a large health care organization.” New England Journal of Medicine 385.23 (2021): 2132-2139.
19) Mevorach, Dror, et al. “Myocarditis after BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against C0\/lD-19 in Israel.” New England Journal of Medicine 385.23 (2021): 2140-2149.
20) Truong, Dongngan T., et al. “Clinically suspected myocarditis temporally related to C0\/lD-19 vaccination in adolescents and young adults: suspected myocarditis after C0\/lD-19 vaccination.” Circulation 145.5 (2022): 345-356.
21) Rosner, Carolyn M., et al. “Myocarditis temporally associated with C0\/lD-19 vaccination.” Circulation 144.6 (2021): 502-505.
22) Levin, Dan, et al. “Myocarditis following C0\/lD-19 vaccination–a case series.” Vaccine 39.42 (2021): 6195-6200.
23) Craddock, Vaughn, et al. “Persistent circulation of soluble and extracellular vesicle‐linked Spike protein in individuals with postacute sequelae of C0\/lD‐19.” Journal of Medical Virology 95.2 (2023): e28568.
24) Craddock, Vaughn, et al. “Persistent circulation of soluble and extracellular vesicle‐linked Spike protein in individuals with postacute sequelae of C0\/lD‐19.” Journal of Medical Virology 95.2 (2023): e28568.
25) Craddock, Vaughn, et al. “Persistent presence of spike protein and viral RNA in the circulation of individuals with post-acute sequelae of C0\/lD-19.” MedRxiv (2022): 2022-08.
Female Balb/c mice (10 per group) were experienced with a primary series of monovalent BNT162b2 Original vaccine and a 3rd booster dose of bivalent BNT162b2 (Original+BA.4/5) vaccine. Mice then received a 4th booster dose of either a bivalent BNT162b2 (Original+BA.4/5) or a monovalent BNT162b2 (XBB.1.5) vaccine. Data were generated by same pseudovirus neutralization assay and from sera of same mouse study presented at VRBPAC June 15, 2023 meeting (https://www.fda.gov/media/169541/download).
Data on file: Pfizer-BioNTech. September 2023.
27) Lin, Dan-Yu, et al. “Effects of vaccination and previous infection on omicron infections in children.” New England Journal of Medicine 387.12 (2022): 1141-1143.
28) Extensive Efficacy Studies that Rebuke Vaccine Mandates
By Paul Elias AlexanderPaul Elias Alexander October 28, 2021
29) Sept 13, 2023: State of Florida Dept of Health Guidance on C0\/ld Boosters FDA Approved Sept 11.
—————————————————————— –
30) Animal Study: Eens, Sander, et al. “B-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma following intravenous BNT162b2 mRNA booster in a BALB/c mouse: A case report.” Frontiers in Oncology 13 (2023).
31) Jurgens, Eric Matthew, et al. “Serologic response to mRNA C0\/lD‐19 vaccination in lymphoma patients.” American journal of hematology 96.11 (2021): E410.
With regard to anti‐CD20 mAbs, our results are consistent with a growing number of reports that patients on active, or with recent anti‐CD20 mAb treatment do not respond to vaccination
In conclusion, we found that most lymphoma patients respond to vaccination with an mRNA‐based C0\/lD‐19 vaccine, but a substantial fraction (>40%) do not and therefore may remain at risk of infection and disease.
Our results are particularly concerning for patients on anti‐CD20 mAb therapy, given that no patients who had received treatment within 6 months responded well to mRNA vaccination.
——————————————– –
32) 10 Worst Hazards of the COVID Vaccines, The Defeat Of COVID Dr. Colleen Huber
Feb 21, 2023, Dr Huber has 16 years experience as a naturopathic oncologist.
3. (p 68) One of the most important papers in the COVID era shows that the COVID vaccines damage the immune system, and allow new cancers to form, due to devastating interference with Type I interferon signaling pathways.
Seneff, Nigh, Kyriakopoulos and McCullough showed that the most profound threat to the human immune function from the mRNA COVID vaccines is by means of obstruction of Type I interferon signaling pathways. [3] The disabling of this most important cytokine known to immunology creates downstream mayhem. The surveillance capabilities of the immune system become disabled with regard to cancer detection. This lights-out subterfuge allows both new tumors and metastases of existing cancer, in the COVID-vaccinated to grow without opposition from our immune system. Hence the emergence of the new turbo cancers. Whereas those of us who were naturally infected with SARS-CoV-2 were able to up-regulate Type I interferon when needed, mRNA-vaccinated people have not shown this ability.
33) Seneff, Stephanie, et al. “Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs.” Food and Chemical Toxicology 164 (2022): 113008.
The mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were brought to market in response to the public health crises of Covid-19. The utilization of mRNA vaccines in the context of infectious disease has no precedent. The many alterations in the vaccine mRNA hide the mRNA from cellular defenses and promote a longer biological half-life and high production of spike protein. However, the immune response to the vaccine is very different from that to a SARS-CoV-2 infection. In this paper, we present evidence that vaccination induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health. Immune cells that have taken up the vaccine nanoparticles release into circulation large numbers of exosomes containing spike protein along with critical microRNAs that induce a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites. We also identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance. These disturbances potentially have a causal link to neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell’s palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, impaired DNA damage response and tumorigenesis. We show evidence from the VAERS database supporting our hypothesis. We believe a comprehensive risk/benefit assessment of the mRNA vaccines questions them as positive contributors to public health.
34) Neither Safe Nor Effective: The Evidence Against the COVID Vaccines Paperback – May 14, 2022 by Dr. Colleen Huber (Author)
35) A Startling Compilation: ‘Neither Safe Nor Effective‘ Zero Hedge
36) Irrgang, Pascal, et al. “Class switch toward noninflammatory, spike-specific IgG4 antibodies after repeated SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination.” Science immunology 8.79 (2022): eade2798.
———————————————– ————————— –
64 cases of Turbo Cancer by Dr. William Makis
37) September 28, 2023 “Turbo Cancers” Are Decimating Young Doctors: 54 Cases Examined
Out of 180 Canadian doctors who have died unexpectedly since COVID-19 vaccines rolled out in Canada, 42 had cancer. Guest Post by Dr. William Makis
38) Nakahara, Takehiro, et al. “Assessment of Myocardial 18F-FDG Uptake at PET/CT in Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2-vaccinated and Nonvaccinated Patients.” Radiology 308.3 (2023): e230743.
39) Pre-Print: DNA fragments detected in monovalent and bivalent Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada: Exploratory dose response relationship with serious adverse events.
Authors David J Speicher Jessica Rose L. Maria Gutschi David M Wiseman PhD Kevin McKernan
40) C0\/lD mRNA vaccines contain excessive quantities of bacterial DNA: evidence and implications. Michael Palmer, MD and Jonathan Gilthorpe, PhD April 5, 2023
Recent studies by Kevin McKernan, a leading expert in sequencing methods for DNA and RNA, have revealed that batches of the modified mRNA vaccines produced by both Pfizer and Moderna contain a high proportion of contaminating bacterial DNA. In all, the DNA accounts for up to 20-35% of the nucleic acids contained in each of the vaccine batches. These alarmingly high concentrations far exceed the levels deemed safe by standard-setting organizations such as the European Medicines Agency (EMA).
Conclusion: The presence of contaminating plasmid DNA in Pfizer’s and Moderna’s mRNA vaccines entails severe health risks, in addition to those which were already known and understood. Preeminent among these risks are the prolonged expression of spike protein, which may lead to correspondingly prolonged and more destructive autoimmune-like inflammation, and the induction of malignant disease after chromosomal integration of the plasmid DNA. Furthermore, the sheer scale of the contamination proves conclusively that the manufacturers have not mastered or properly implemented the designed production processes. Each of these issues alone would be reason enough to demand the immediate withdrawal of these vaccines.
41) Betacoronavirus mRNA vaccine Patent, Current Assignee ModernaTx Inc
The direct injection of genetically engineered DNA (e.g., naked plasmid DNA) into a living host results in a small number of its cells directly producing an antigen, resulting in a protective immunological response. With this technique, however, comes potential problems, including the possibility of insertional mutagenesis, which could lead to the activation of oncogenes or the inhibition of tumor suppressor genes.
Jeffrey Dach MD
7450 Griffin Road, Suite 190
Davie, Fl 33314
954-792-4663
my blog: www.jeffreydachmd.com
Natural Thyroid Toolkit by Jeffrey Dach MD
Cracking Cancer Toolkit by Jeffrey Dach MD
Heart Book by Jeffrey Dach MD
www.naturalmedicine101.com
www.bioidenticalhormones101.com
www.truemedmd.com
www.drdach.com
Click Here for: Dr Dach’s Online Store for Pure Encapsulations Supplements
Click Here for: Dr Dach’s Online Store for Nature’s Sunshine Supplements
Web Site and Discussion Board Links:
jdach1.typepad.com/blog/
disc.yourwebapps.com/Indices/244066.html
disc.yourwebapps.com/Indices/244067.html
http://sci.med.narkive.com/covV2Qo2/jeffrey-dach-book-announcment-natural-medicine-101
The reader is advised to discuss the comments on these pages with his/her personal physicians and to only act upon the advice of his/her personal physician. Also note that concerning an answer which appears as an electronically posted question, I am NOT creating a physician — patient relationship. Although identities will remain confidential as much as possible, as I can not control the media, I can not take responsibility for any breaches of confidentiality that may occur.
Link to this Article
Copyright (c) 2023 Jeffrey Dach MD All Rights Reserved. This article may be reproduced on the internet without permission, provided there is a link to this page and proper credit is given. See Repost Guidelines.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of significance. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
Serving Areas of: Hollywood, Aventura, Miami, Fort Lauderdale, Pembroke Pines, Miramar, Davie, Coral Springs, Cooper City, Sunshine Ranches, Hallandale, Surfside, Miami Beach, Sunny Isles, Normandy Isles, Coral Gables, Hialeah, Golden Beach ,Kendall,sunrise, coral springs, parkland,pompano, boca raton, palm beach, weston, dania beach, tamarac, oakland park, boynton beach, delray,lake worth,wellington,plantation
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.