by Jeffrey Dach MD
A good friend, age 60, has a mild hypertension, 147 mm Hg systolic, and accordingly takes blood pressure pills. The current guideline recommends treatment for blood pressure above 140 mm Hg systolic, regardless of age, usually with a “water pill” called a thiazide diuretic(1). My friend asks me, does he need to take these blood pressure pills forever?
Above Image: Sphyngomanometer courtesy of wikimedia commons.
Blood Pressure 101, the Real Story
As we age, we all develop “hardening of the arteries”, also called atherosclerotic vascular disease. This involves the gradual loss of flexibility and increased stiffness of the arterial walls from loss of elastin fibers as we age. This process also involves a more serious caking up of plaque inside the arteries which can block blood flow and cause a heart attack or stroke.
Mechanical Stress from Pulsations Produces Damage
Our hearts beat about 80 times per minutes at rest, and each heart beat produces a pulsatile wave of pressure which expands the arterial wall. These pulsatile waves produce mechanical stress which cause small cracks at weak points where the arteries divide. The body must repair these cracks, and the repair mechanism involves deposition of cholesterol plaque to seal these small cracks and prevent leakage. The final result of the repair process is the plaque buildup which blocks blood flow causing heart attacks and strokes. Sometimes the repair process involves inflammation which causes more damage to the lining of the artery.
A Lower Blood Pressure Reduces Mechanical Stress on the Arteries
Reducing the blood pressure obviously reduces the mechanical stress on the arteries, and thereby reduces the risk of heart attack and stroke. The real question is, “what blood pressure level requires treatment?”, and “what is the optimal target area for the lowered blood pressure?” A blood pressure brought too low with pills leads to dizziness and fainting, so too low is not good either.
Blood Pressure Normally Rises with Age
The blood pressure increases gradually with age, a normal consequence of aging, but the guidelines ignore this, and use the same number, 140 mm Hg as a treatment threshold for all ages, and genders.(22) Why is this?
The Famous Framingham Study, the Basis for the BP Guideline
The blood pressure treatment guideline is based on the famous Framingham Study which showed the benefits of blood pressure reduction. The 18 year Framingham Blood Pressure study found increased risk of heart disease and death in people with blood pressure 140 to 160 mm Hg, and even more risk above 160 mm Hg. (NEJM, Levy)(2)(4) (5)(6)(7)(8).
Discrepancy Between Raw Data and Computer Smoothed Data:
Let’s examine the original data from the study in Figure 1 (below). Here is the Framingham Study Data with computer smoothing as published in the medical journals. Note the smooth gradual line of increasing mortality as blood pressure goes up between 140 and 160 mm Hg. This is called the Linear Model.(from Port, Lancet)(17)(18)(28)
(See Figure 1 below. )
Linear Model -Figure 1. Courtesy Dr.
Next in Figure 2 (below), here is the original Framingham RAW Data before computer smoothing. Notice the mortality rate is fairly constant at 15 deaths per 1000 until a blood pressure of 160 mm Hg is exceeded. This suggests a threshold of 160 mm Hg blood pressure above which treatment is desirable and beneficial. The relationship in Figure Two is NOT linear. (from Port, Lancet)(17)(18)(28) These two charts, Figure 1 and Figure 2, are quite different. Figure One is linear because of computer smoothing, and Figure Two shows non-linear raw data.
Non-Linear Model – Figure 2. Courtesy Dr. Port Lancet(17)(18)(28)
Notice that the raw data in Figure 2 is non-linear, and does not support the Linear Model.
Doctor Port introduces a new model which takes into account age and gender. The mortality risk increases steadily with blood pressures that exceed a threshold based on sex and age. The threshold blood pressure formula is 110 + (2/3) (age) for a man aged 45-74, and 104 +(5/6) age for a woman aged 45-74. Here is the Lancet chart for the blood pressure thresholds, showing treatment thresholds based on age and gender.(17) (18)(28)
Age……Male BP Threshold….Female BP Threshold 70th percentile
45……….139…………………….142 mm Hg
50……….143…………………….146 mm Hg
55……….147…………………….150 mm Ng
60……….150…………………….154 mm Hg
65……….153…………………….158 mm Hg
70……….157…………………….162 mm Hg
According to this chart, a blood pressure of 147 mm Hg in a 60 year old man does not require treatment with “water pills”. Blood pressure goes up with age, and this is normal.
Before you run to your doctor with a print out of this newsletter, please be aware of the response by Dr. Lenfant, Director National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), the agency which funded Dr. Port’s report. Dr. Lenfant outright rejected Dr. Port’s non-linear model, and he restates his belief the relationship between mortality and blood pressure is a clear linear one.(9)
Here is what Dr. Lenfant says, “A study funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) and published in the January 15 issue of the Lancet (by Port) challenges [us] by asserting that the relationship between systolic blood pressure and mortality is not “continuous and graded.” After careful review of this study, the NHLBI finds that it does not offer a basis for changing the current hypertension guidelines….We attach great value to new scientific findings and our careful review of Dr. Port’s paper finds his analysis thought provoking. However, we would not recommend a change in the guidelines based on one epidemiological analysis….The totality of evidence found a clear linear relationship between systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and deaths.”
Perhaps Dr. Lenfant didn’t actually look at figure 2 raw data which clearly shows it is non-linear.
Dr. Lewiston published a rebuttal in Lancet 2002 which says ” Throughout middle and old age, usual blood pressure is strongly and directly related to vascular (and overall) mortality, without any evidence of a threshold down to at least 115/75 mm Hg” (12). Dr. Lewiston apparently didn’t look at raw data figure 2, either.
Jan Basile, MD, Walter A. Brzezinski, MD published a rebuttal in the Journal of Clinical Hypertension J Clin Hypertens 2(4):290-294, 2000. which says that the Port paper did not evaluate morbidity, (i.e. non-fatal strokes and heart attacks), which the SHEP study did examine and the SHEP study showed considerable reduction in morbidity by reducing systolic pressure.(29)(15) They argued that the reduction in stroke morbidity in the SHEP study justifies treatment with blood pressure pills for the 140-160 range. This discussion can be found at the AngryDoc Blog.(14)
The problem with this reasoning is the SHEP study patients all started with blood pressures above 160, and does not address the below 160 question asked by Port. The Shep data showed a reduction of 5 years stroke rate from 8.2 to 5.2 per cent. However the average blood pressure was 170, with all patients above 160 at the start. There is no question that BP’s above 160 require treatment, our question pertains to the 140 to 160 range which showed no increased mortality in the Framingham raw data. “No randomized trial has ever demonstrated any reduction in risk of either overall or cardiovascular death by reducing systolic blood pressure from the thresholds in the above chart by Dr. Port to below 140 mm HG”. (17)(18)(28)
Three Factors at Work
What is the risk of stroke and heart attack at any particular blood pressure? Is lower better, and if so, how low is better? Perhaps the use of blood pressure to assess CV disease risk is too simplistic. The cause of damaged and diseased arteries is more complicated than simple blood pressure. There are multiple factors at work to produce damaged blood vessels which lead to heart attack and stroke.
First Factor is Mechanical Stress
The first factor is the mechanical stress on the artery wall represented by the pressure. This pressure wave is pulsatile, and has a waveform which is more complex than a simple blood pressure number. The second factor is the intrinsic strength of the arterial wall which is made of collagen. The third factor is the vigor of the reparative mechanism mounted as a defense against the small cracks in the wall from mechanical stress which may cause an inflammatory response inside the arterial wall. The fourth doctor is the extent of underlying arterial disease. If the arteries are already severely damaged with extensive plaque formation, then even small increases in blood pressure could be potentially damaging. In patients with severe underlying arterial disease with known claudication, angina, or history of stroke and heart attack, controlling the blood pressure is a more urgent issue.
Arterial stiffness increases with age, requiring more pressure to perfuse the arterial system than the younger, more elastic arterial tree. This “arterial stiffness” can be studied with various techniques such as ultrasound of carotid artery thickness, the pulse pressure and the pulse wave form, and these techniques are all excellent indicators of cardiovascular disease risk and strong predictors of stroke, and actually may be more representative of mechanical stress on the arterial wall than simple blood pressure measurement.(21)(22)(24)(25)
Second Factor is Arterial Strength
The second factor is the intrinsic strength of the arterial wall which is made of the protein called collagen. For example, vitamin C deficiency is associated with poor collagen formation and increased risk of stroke as discussed in a previous newsletter. (27) Blood pressure pills do nothing to improve the strength of the arterial system, on the other hand, supplemental vitamin C increases collagen formation and strengthens artery walls.
The trace mineral Copper is required as a cofactor for elastin production which allows the arteries to be flexible and elastic. Copper deficiency is associated with weakening in the wall and bubble formation in the arteries, called aneurysms, caused by lack of elastin.(26) The third factor, inflammation inside the artery as a repair mechanism can be addressed with options discussed on my web site Heart Disease page.(30)
Complete Evaluation is More than a Simple Blood Pressure
A more complete vascular evaluation includes an ultrasound of the carotid arteries to measure wall thickness, an aortic ultrasound to screen for aneurysm, and measurement of the pulse pressure (this is the difference between systolic and diastolic pressures). A knowledge of the medical history and pre-existing risk factors such as smoking and diabetes is also important. After reviewing all this information, an informed decision can be made to treat or not to treat patients with blood pressures below 160.
In a healthy adult with no other risk factors, and a blood pressure below 160, the Framingham Study raw data clearly shows no mortality risk. Therefore, following the guidelines published in Lancet by Port is a valid personal choice. The current blood pressure treatment guidelines are based on deceptive data smoothing on the Framingham data set, resulting in lower treatment thresholds which translate into extra billions of dollars for the drug companies. Should you accept the “Linear Model” or the NonLinear model? That is an individual decision that is up to you depending oin your knowledge of your own risk factors. After all, its your body and your blood pressure.
Patients with normal arteries have the luxury to explore all options. However, in patients with known vascular disease with history of angina, claudication, previous stroke or heart attack, controlling the blood pressure becomes more urgent. In this severely diseased group, even small elevations of blood pressure may be harmful.
More information on lowering your blood pressure naturally without drugs can be found at my web site at this page.(31) Thanks to Joel Kauffman PhD for chapter 4 in his book, Malignant Medical Myths which brought this information to my attention.(10)
Articles with related Content:
Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, Jones DW, Materson BJ, Oparil S, Wright JT Jr, Roccella EJ. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension 2003 Dec;42(6):1206-52.
(4) list of publications from the Framingham heart study
NIH Framingham study web site
1288 publications from the Framingham data
The Natural History of Borderline Isolated Systolic Hypertension
Alex Sagie, Martin G. Larson, and Daniel Levy. NEJM Volume 329:1912-1917 December 23, 1993 Number 26
Statement from Claude Lenfant, M.D., NHLBI Director, on Systolic Blood Pressure, Deaths, and Treatment Guidelines
(10) “Malignant Medical Myths” by Joel Kaufman, PhD, page 105 to 129, Myth 4.
listing of 151 different thiazide blood pressure medications on RxList.com
Lewington S, et al.;Prospective Studies Collaboration. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet. 2002 Dec 14;360(9349):1903-13. This Confirms Linear Model “INTERPRETATION: Throughout middle and old age, usual blood pressure is strongly and directly related to vascular (and overall) mortality, without any evidence of a threshold down to at least 115/75 mm Hg.”
The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003 May 21;289(19):2560-72. This article confirms the Linear Model.
The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. Vol. 265 No. 24, June 26, 1991 JAMA. Chobanian AV et al. Advocates the Linear Model for Hypertension.
SHEP Cooperative Research Group. Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension: final results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). JAMA. 1991;65:3255–3264. CONCLUSION. In persons aged 60 years and over with isolated systolic hypertension, antihypertensive stepped-care drug treatment …reduced the incidence of total stroke by 36%, with 5-year absolute benefit of 30 events per 1000 participants. Major cardiovascular events were reduced, with 5-year absolute benefit of 55 events per 1000.
FRAMINGHAM HEART STUDY.NEJM Volume 329:1912-1917 December 23, 1993 Number 26. The Natural History of Borderline Isolated Systolic Hypertension Alex Sagie, Martin G. Larson, and Daniel Levy
Lancet. 2000 Jan 15;355(9199):175-80. Systolic blood pressure and mortality. Port S, Demer L, Jennrich R, Walter D, Garfinkel A. (Port article #1)
Abstract, Lancet. 2000 Jan 15;355(9199):175-80. Systolic blood pressure and mortality. Port S, Demer L, Jennrich R, Walter D, Garfinkel A. INTERPRETATION: The Framingham data contradict the concept that lower pressures imply lower risk and the idea that 140 mm Hg is a useful cut-off value for hypertension for all adults. There is an age-dependent and sex-dependent threshold for hypertension. A substantial proportion of the population who would currently be thought to be at increased risk are, therefore, at no increased risk.
Assessment of arterial stiffness in clinical practice. I.S. Mackenzie, I.B. Wilkinson and J.R. Cockcroft. Q J Med 2002; 95: 67-74. Over 100 years ago, arterial stiffness was recognized as important in predicting cardiovascular disease.
Circulation. 1997;96:308-315.Hemodynamic Patterns of Age-Related Changes in Blood Pressure The Framingham Heart Study Stanley S. Franklin, MD; William Gustin, IV, BS; Nathan D. Wong, PhD; Martin G. Larson, ScD; Michael A. Weber, MD; William B. Kannel, MD; ; Daniel Levy, MD. Framingham study which shows BP increases with age.
Circulation. 1999;100:951-957. Common Carotid Intima-Media Thickness and Arterial Stiffness, Indicators of Cardiovascular Risk in High-Risk Patients The SMART Study (Second Manifestations of Arterial disease) Petra C. G. Simons, MD, PhD; Ale Algra, MD, PhD; Michiel L. Bots, MD, PhD; Diederick E. Grobbee, MD, PhD; Yolanda van der Graaf, MD, PhD; for the SMART Study Group.
(Hypertension. 1999;34:375-380.) Isolated Systolic Hypertension Prognostic Information Provided by Pulse Pressure Michael J. Domanski; Barry R. Davis; Marc A. Pfeffer; Mark Kastantin; Gary F. Mitchell
Abstract—Increased arterial stiffness results in increased characteristic impedance of the aorta and increased pulse wave velocity, which increases systolic and pulse pressures. An association between increased pulse pressure and adverse cardiovascular events has been found in normotensive and hypertensive patient populations. Increased pulse pressure has also been associated with thickening of the carotid intima and media. However, the relationship between pulse pressure and stroke has not previously been evaluated. In this study, we examined the hypothesis that pulse pressure is an independent predictor of stroke in elderly patients with systolic hypertension entered in the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program. Differences in baseline characteristics were examined by tertiles of pulse pressure. The independent prognostic value of pulse pressure and mean arterial pressure for predicting either stroke or total mortality was assessed with Cox proportional hazards models that included pulse pressure, mean arterial pressure, and other variables that were significant on univariate analysis. This analysis demonstrated an 11% increase in stroke risk and a 16% increase in risk of all-cause mortality for each 10-mm Hg increase in pulse pressure. Each 10-mm Hg increase in mean arterial pressure was independently associated with a 20% increase in the risk of stroke and a 14% increase in the risk of all-cause mortality. These data provide strong evidence of an association of increased conduit vessel stiffness, as indicated by increased pulse pressure, with stroke and total mortality, independent of the effects of mean arterial pressure, in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension.
Decreased hepatic copper levels. A possible chemical marker for the pathogenesis of aortic aneurysms in man. Arch Surg. 1982 Sep;117(9):1212-3. Tilson MD. Copper is a cofactor for elastin production. Copper is needed for the proper function of the enzyme lysyl oxidase, which is required in the crosslinking of collagen and elastin.
Vitamin C and Stroke Prevention by Jeffrey Dach MD.
European Heart Journal (2000) 21, 1635–1638, EUHJ.2000.2227, There is a non-linear relationship between mortality and blood pressure. S. PORT A. GARFINKEL N. BOYLE
Analysis of Recent Papers in Hypertension, Jan Basile, MD, Senior Editor
Michael J. Bloch, MD. The Journal of Clinical Hypertension, Volume 9 Issue 7 Page 576-581, July 2007
Hypertension by Jeffrey Dach MD
News Groups Links
Jeffrey Dach MD
7450 Griffin Road Suite 190
Davie, Florida 33314
Disclaimer click here: http://www.drdach.com/wst_page20.html
The reader is advised to discuss the comments on these pages with his/her personal physicians and to only act upon the advice of his/her personal physician. Also note that concerning an answer which appears as an electronically posted question, I am NOT creating a physician — patient relationship.
Although identities will remain confidential as much as possible, as I can not control the media, I can not take responsibility for any breaches of confidentiality that may occur.
Link to this article: http://wp.me/P3gFbV-C3
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeffrey Dach MD All Rights Reserved
This article may be reproduced on the internet without permission, provided there is a link to this page and proper credit is given.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of significance. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
Serving Areas of: Hollywood, Aventura, Miami, Fort Lauderdale, Pembroke Pines, Miramar, Davie, Coral Springs, Cooper City, Sunshine Ranches, Hallandale, Surfside, Miami Beach, Sunny Isles, Normandy Isles, Coral Gables, Hialeah, Golden Beach ,Kendall,sunrise, coral springs, parkland,pompano, boca raton, palm beach, weston, dania beach, tamarac, oakland park, boynton beach, delray,lake worth,wellington,plantation
Link to this article:http://wp.me/P3gFbV-C3