Cholesterol Lowering Drugs for the Elderly, Bad Idea

Old_Woman3Cholesterol Lowering Drugs for the Elderly, Bad Idea by Jeffrey Dach MD

A Flawed and Corrupted Study

A 2008 publication by Jonathon Afilalo in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology concludes that,” Statins reduce all-cause mortality in elderly patients and the magnitude of this effect is substantially larger than had been previously estimated. “

Statistics Manipulated

This 2008 metanalysis by Afilalo is a statistical sleight of hand that gives the results opposite to reality.  Their conclusion is directly opposite to multiple previous studies.  Also, this published study had no Disclosure Statement, another warning sign of bias from authors receiving compensation from drug companies.

Lowering Cholesterol in the Elderly is a BAD IDEA

Contrary to the above flawed 2008 meta-analysis, it is a very bad idea to lower the cholesterol levels in the elderly with statin drugs. An excellent article on the topic appeared on the Junk Food Science Blog.

Here’s the evidence:

1) The Honolulu Heart Study published in Lancet 2001, showed that patients with the lowest cholesterol had the highest mortality.  The authors concluded,

“These data cast doubt on the scientific justification for lowering cholesterol to very low concentrations  in elderly people.”

2) Krumholz from Yale published his study in JAMA 1994 looking at elevated cholesterol to see if it was associated with increased all-cause mortality or heart disease.  He reported that elevated cholesterol was NOT a risk factor for mortality or heart disease.  He said:

“our findings do not support the hypothesis that hypercholesterolemia or low HDL-C are important risk factors for all-cause mortality, coronary heart disease mortality, or hospitalization for myocardial infarction or unstable angina in this cohort of persons older than 70 years.”

3) Beatrice Golomb MD in Geriatric Times 2004, reports that in the elderly, higher cholesterol is linked with improved survival.  Dr Golomb  says:

“While patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease receive mortality benefit from statins in studies predominating in middle-aged men (Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group, 1994), no trend toward survival benefit is seen in elderly patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease (Shepherd et al., 2002).   A less favorable risk-benefit profile may particularly hold for patients older than 85, in whom benefits may be more attenuated and risks more amplified (Weverling-Rijnsburger et al., 1997). In fact, in this older group, higher cholesterol has been linked observationally to improved survival.”

Update June 2016: Lack of an association or an inverse association between low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and mortality in the elderly: a systematic review BMJ Open 2016;6:e010401 Uffe Ravnskov et al.

Update April 2014:  Yet another study shows that low cholesterol is a predictor of increased mortality in the elderly:

“Our results indicate an association between lower serum TC concentrations and increased all-cause mortality in a community-dwelling, very elderly population. Mortality decreased with the increases in both TC and LDL-C concentrations, after adjustment for various confounding factors. These findings suggest that low TC and low LDL-C may be independent predictors of high mortality in the very elderly”  Quote from Clin Interv Aging. 2014; 9: 293–300.  Serum total cholesterol concentration and 10-year mortality in an 85-year-old population. Yutaka Takata, Toshihiro Ansai, and Kazuo Sonoki.

Adverse Side Effects of Statin Drugs

Adverse side effects from statin drugs are devastating with cognitive impairment, dementia, neuropathy, and muscle damage.

New Cholesterol Guidelines are Wrong

In September 2004 numerous prestigious doctors petitioned the FDA with a letter asking that the cholesterol guidelines be re-evaluated.  They had been set lower by a corrupt committee of doctors receiving money from the drug companies.

To read more about cholesterol and the elderly, Drugs That Don’t Work and Natural Therapies That Do! David Brownstein MD. Chapter 2 covers Cholesterol Lowering Drugs.For more information see my previous articles:

Articles with Related Interest:

Defending the Cholesterol Hypothesis in the Elderly

Cholesterol Lowering Statin Drugs for Women, Just Say No

Lipitor and The Dracula of Modern Technology

CAT Coronary Calcium Scoring, Reversing Heart Disease

Coronary Calcium Score Benefits of Aged Garlic

Jeffrey Dach MD

Links and References

Here are additional studies and references why lowering the cholesterol in the elderly leads to increased mortality:

1a) Forette Lancet 1989: Mortality was lowest at serum cholesterol 7.0 mmol/l (271), Mortality was 5.2 times higher at a cholesterol of 155 compared to mortality at cholesterol of 271.

2a) Weverling, Lancet 1997 , In people older than 85 years, high total cholesterol concentrations are associated with longevity owing to lower mortality from cancer and infection.

3a) Kelleher J Womens Health 2004,  Low cholesterol was significantly associated with all-cause mortality, showing significant associations with death through cancer, liver diseases, and mental diseases.  This applied to men, across the entire age range, and in women from the age of 50 onward only.

references (1a 2a 3a)

Lancet. 1989 Apr 22;1(8643):868-70.

Cholesterol as risk factor for mortality in elderly women.

Forette B, Tortrat D, Wolmark Y. Centre Claude Bernard de Gérontologie, Hôpital Sainte Périne, Paris, France.

92 women aged 60 years and over (mean 82.2, SD 8.6) living in a nursing home and free from overt cancer were followed-up for 5 years. 53 died during this period; necropsy revealed cancer in only 1 patient. Serum total cholesterol at entry ranged from 4.0 to 8.8 mmol/l (mean 6.3, SD 1.1). Cox’s proportional hazards analysis showed a J-shaped relation between serum cholesterol and mortality.

Mortality was lowest at serum cholesterol 7.0 mmol/l (271), 5.2 times higher than the minimum at serum cholesterol 4.0 mmol/l (155), and only 1.8 times higher when cholesterol concentration was 8.8 mmol/l (340). This relation held true irrespective of age, even when blood pressure, body weight, history of myocardial infarction, creatinine clearance, and plasma proteins were taken into account. The relation between low cholesterol values and increased mortality was independent of the incidence of cancer. conversion factor (multiply by 38.67)

Total cholesterol and risk of mortality in the oldest old.Lancet. 1997 Oct 18;350(9085):1119-23.

Weverling-Rijnsburger AW, Blauw GJ, Lagaay AM, Knook DL, Meinders AE, Westendorp RG.
Department of General Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: The impact of total serum cholesterol as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease decreases with age, which casts doubt on the necessity for cholesterol-lowering therapy in the elderly. We assessed the influence of total cholesterol concentrations on specific and all-cause mortality in people aged 85 years and over.

METHODS: In 724 participants (median age 89 years), total cholesterol concentrations were measured and mortality risks calculated over 10 years of follow-up. Three categories of total cholesterol concentrations were defined: < 5.0 mmol/L (194), 5.0-6.4 mmol/L, and > or = 6.5mmol/L (251). In a subgroup of 137 participants, total cholesterol was measured again after 5 years of follow-up. Mortality risks for the three categories of total cholesterol concentrations were estimated with a Cox proportional-hazards model, adjusted for age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors. The primary causes of death were coded according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9).

FINDINGS: During 10 years of follow-up from Dec 1, 1986, to Oct 1, 1996, a total of 642 participants died. Each 1 mmol/L increase in total cholesterol (39) corresponded to a 15% decrease in mortality (risk ratio 0.85 [95% CI 0.79-0.91]). This risk estimate was similar in the subgroup of participants who had stable cholesterol concentrations over a 5-year period. The main cause of death was cardiovascular disease with a similar mortality risk in the three total cholesterol categories. Mortality from cancer and infection was significantly lower among the participants in the highest total cholesterol category than in the other categories, which largely explained the lower all-cause mortality in this category.

INTERPRETATION: In people older than 85 years, high total cholesterol concentrations are associated with longevity owing to lower mortality from cancer and infection. The effects of cholesterol-lowering therapy have yet to be assessed.


J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2004 Jan-Feb;13(1):41-53.

Why Eve is not Adam: prospective follow-up in 149,650 women and men of cholesterol and other risk factors related to cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. by Ulmer H, Kelleher C, Diem G, Concin H. Institute of Biostatistics and Documentation, Leopold Franzens University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of sex-specific patterns in cholesterol levels on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the Vorarlberg Health Monitoring and Promotion Programme (VHM&PP).

METHODS : In this study, 67413 men and 82237 women (aged 20-95 years) underwent 454448 standardized examinations, which included measures of blood pressure, height, weight, and fasting samples for cholesterol, triglycerides, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), and glucose in the 15-year period 1985-1999. Relations between these variables and risk of death were analyzed using two approaches of multivariate analyses (Cox proportional hazard and GEE models).

RESULTS: Patterns of cholesterol levels showed marked differences between men and women in relation to age and cause of death. The role of high cholesterol in predicting death from coronary heart disease could be confirmed in men of all ages and in women under the age of 50.

In men, across the entire age range, although of borderline significance under the age of 50, and in women from the age of 50 onward only, low cholesterol was significantly associated with all-cause mortality, showing significant associations with death through cancer, liver diseases, and mental diseases. Triglycerides > 200 mg/dl had an effect in women 65 years and older but not in men.

CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale population-based study clearly demonstrates the contrasting patterns of cholesterol level in relation to risk, particularly among those less well studied previously, that is, women of all ages and younger people of both sexes. For the first time, we demonstrate that the low cholesterol effect occurs even among younger respondents, contradicting the previous assessments among cohorts of older people that this is a proxy or marker for frailty occurring with age.
Reading the evidence closely — statins for seniors

Weverling-Rijnsburger, Annelies WE, et al. “Total cholesterol and risk of mortality in the oldest old.” Lancet 350 (1997): 1119-23. Total cholesterol and risk of mortality in the oldest old Weverling Rijnsburger Lancet 1997

The results of our study show that for both men and women of 85 years and older, high total serum cholesterol concentrations are inversely correlated with mortality—ie, high cholesterol is associated with increased survival. Our study shows that a high total serum cholesterol concentration is not a risk factor for cardiovascular disease in people aged 85 years and over—on the contrary, it is associated with longevity. On the evidence of our data, cholesterol-lowering therapy in the elderly is questionable.
Lancet. 2001 Aug 4;358(9279):351-5.
Cholesterol and all-cause mortality in elderly people from the Honolulu Heart Program: a cohort study. Schatz IJ, Masaki K, Yano K, Chen R, Rodriguez BL, Curb JD.
Clinical Epidemiology and Geriatrics Division, Department of Medicine, John A Bums School of Medicine, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 1356 Lusitana Street, 7th Floor, Honolulu, HI 96813-2427, USA.

BACKGROUND: A generally held belief is that cholesterol concentrations should be kept low to lessen the risk of cardiovascular disease. However, studies of the relation between serum cholesterol and all-cause mortality in elderly people have shown contrasting results. To investigate these discrepancies, we did a longitudinal assessment of changes in both lipid and serum cholesterol concentrations over 20 years, and compared them with mortality. METHODS: Lipid and serum cholesterol concentrations were measured in 3572 Japanese/American men (aged 71-93 years) as part of the Honolulu Heart Program. We compared changes in these concentrations over 20 years with all-cause mortality using three different Cox proportional hazards models. FINDINGS: Mean cholesterol fell significantly with increasing age. Age-adjusted mortality rates were 68.3, 48.9, 41.1, and 43.3 for the first to fourth quartiles of cholesterol concentrations, respectively. Relative risks for mortality were 0.72 (95% CI 0.60-0.87), 0.60 (0.49-0.74), and 0.65 (0.53-0.80), in the second, third, and fourth quartiles, respectively, with quartile 1 as reference. A Cox proportional hazard model assessed changes in cholesterol concentrations between examinations three and four. Only the group with low cholesterol concentration at both examinations had a significant association with mortality (risk ratio 1.64, 95% CI 1.13-2.36). INTERPRETATION: We have been unable to explain our results. These data cast doubt on the scientific justification for lowering cholesterol to very low concentrations (<4.65 mmol/L) in elderly people.
JAMA. 1994 Nov 2;272(17):1335-40
Lack of association between cholesterol and coronary heart disease mortality and morbidity and all-cause mortality in persons older than 70 years. Krumholz HM, Seeman TE, Merrill SS, Mendes de Leon CF, Vaccarino V, Silverman DI, Tsukahara R, Ostfeld AM, Berkman LF.  Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520-8017.

OBJECTIVES–To determine whether elevated serum cholesterol level is associated with all-cause mortality, mortality from coronary heart disease, or hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina in persons older than 70 years. Also, to evaluate the association between low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and elevated ratio of serum cholesterol to HDL-C with these outcomes. DESIGN–Prospective, community-based cohort study with yearly interviews. PARTICIPANTS–A total of 997 subjects who were interviewed in 1988 as part of the New Haven, Conn, cohort of the Established Population for the Epidemiologic Study of the Elderly (EPESE) and consented to have blood drawn. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES–The risk factor-adjusted odds ratios of the 4-year incidence of all-cause mortality, mortality from coronary heart disease, and hospitalization for myocardial infarction or unstable angina were calculated for the following: subjects with total serum cholesterol levels greater than or equal to 6.20 mmol/L (> or = 240 mg/dL) compared with subjects with cholesterol levels less than 5.20 mmol/L (< 200 mg/dL); subjects in the lowest tertile of HDL-C level compared with those in the highest tertile; and subjects in the highest tertile of the ratio of total serum cholesterol to HDL-C level compared with those in the lowest tertile. RESULTS–Elevated total serum cholesterol level, low HDL-C, and high total serum cholesterol to HDL-C ratio were not associated with a significantly higher rate of all-cause mortality, coronary heart disease mortality, or hospitalization for myocardial infarction or unstable angina after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors. The risk factor-adjusted odds ratio for all-cause mortality was 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56 to 2.69) for the group who had cholesterol levels greater than or equal to 6.20 mmol/L (> or = 240 mg/dL) compared with the group that had levels less than 5.20 mmol/L (< 200 mg/dL); 1.00 (95% CI, 0.59 to 1.70) for the group in the lowest tertile of HDL-C compared with those in the highest tertile; and 1.03 (95% CK, 0.62 to 1.71) for subjects in the highest tertile of the ratio of total serum cholesterol to HDL-C compared with those in the lowest tertile. CONCLUSIONS–Our findings do not support the hypothesis that hypercholesterolemia or low HDL-C are important risk factors for all-cause mortality, coronary heart disease mortality, or hospitalization for myocardial infarction or unstable angina in this cohort of persons older than 70 years.
Statin Adverse Effects: Implications for the Elderly
by Beatrice A. Golomb, M.D., Ph.D. Geriatric Times  May/June 2004  Vol. V  Issue 3

Discussion  Observational studies show that as age increases within the elderly age range, high cholesterol flattens then reverses as a risk factor for mortality (Weverling-Rijnsburger et al., 1997). Although it remains to be fully clarified whether these findings have relevance to cholesterol-lowering treatment, the exclusive major randomized trial of statins conducted in the elderly does nothing to dispel a possible causal association, as it did not show benefit of statins to survival. The impact was completely neutral on mortality despite selecting for an elderly population at only moderately older age and selecting for particularly high risk of heart disease–the elderly group in whom greater benefits and lower risks would be expected (Shepherd et al., 2002). There are reasons for concern that still older people–those elderly not selecting for high cardiac risk and those who are frailer than clinical trials generally select–might fare less well. Caution should be exercised in provision of statins as with all treatments in elderly patients. Any time a patient develops a new problem or worsening of an existing problem, the medication list should be reviewed and a possible contribution by medications should be considered. This principle is by no means confined to statins. It is particularly true in elderly patients who may be on many medications with interacting effects, and in whom ability to withstand adverse drug reactions may be attenuated.
Letter to Archives of Internal Medicine, submitted on July 20, 2002
Exaggerated benefit of statin treatment in the elderly?    by Uffe Ravnskov, MD, PhD Joel M. Kauffman; PhD, Peter H. Langsjoen, M.D., Kilmer S. McCully, M.D., Paul J. Rosch,
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008; 51:37-45, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.06.063

Statins for Secondary Prevention in Elderly Patients. A Hierarchical Bayesian Meta-Analysis A Hierarchical Bayesian Meta-Analysis, Jonathan Afilalo, MD et al.

Objectives: This study was designed to determine whether statins reduce all-cause mortality in elderly patients with coronary heart disease.

Background: Statins continue to be underutilized in elderly patients because evidence has not consistently shown that they reduce mortality.

Methods: We searched 5 electronic databases, the Internet, and conference proceedings to identify relevant trials. In addition, we obtained unpublished data for the elderly patient subgroups from 4 trials and for the secondary prevention subgroup from the PROSPER (PROspective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk) trial. Inclusion criteria were randomized allocation to statin or placebo, documented coronary heart disease, 50 elderly patients (defined as age 65 years), and 6 months of follow-up. Data were analyzed with hierarchical Bayesian modeling.

Results: We included 9 trials encompassing 19,569 patients with an age range of 65 to 82 years. Pooled rates of all-cause mortality were 15.6% with statins and 18.7% with placebo. We estimated a relative risk reduction of 22% over 5 years (relative risk [RR] 0.78; 95% credible interval [CI] 0.65 to 0.89). Furthermore, statins reduced coronary heart disease mortality by 30% (RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.53 to 0.83), nonfatal myocardial infarction by 26% (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.89), need for revascularization by 30% (RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.53 to 0.83), and stroke by 25% (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.94). The posterior median estimate of the number needed to treat to save 1 life was 28 (95% CI 15 to 56).

Conclusions: Statins reduce all-cause mortality in elderly patients and the magnitude of this effect is substantially larger than had been previously estimated.

But this published study had no Disclosure Statement, which is highly unusual for published studies.
Great Drug, but Does It Prolong Life? New York Times By TARA PARKER-POPE
Published: January 29, 2008

Liang, Yajun, Davide Liborio Vetrano, and Chengxuan Qiu. “Serum total cholesterol and risk of cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality in old age: a population-based study.” BMC geriatrics 17.1 (2017): 294.

Hamazaki, Tomohito, et al. “Towards a paradigm shift in cholesterol treatment.” Ann. Nutr. Metab. 66 (2015): 1-116.  Towards a paradigm shift in cholesterol treatment Hamazaki Tomohito Ann Nutr Metab 2015  Japanese Elderly live longer with higher cholesterol levels.


Higher levels of total cholesterol are associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality, especially non-cardiovascular mortality, among older people; the association is evident mainly among individuals who are not treated with cholesterol-lowering medications. Our study adds to the emerging evidence that the associations of total cholesterol with all-cause mortality may vary with age, cause of death and medical treatment. Caution might be needed for therapeutic control of blood cholesterol among elderly people in the perspective of long-term risk for cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality.


Fair Use Notice:

Link to this article:

Jeffrey Dach MD
7450 Griffin Road Suite 190
Davie, Florida 33314

Disclaimer click here:
The reader is advised to discuss the comments on these pages with  his/her personal physicians and to only act upon the advice of his/her personal physician. Also note that concerning an answer which appears as an electronically posted question, I am NOT creating a physician — patient relationship.

Although identities will remain confidential as much as possible, as I can not control the media, I can not take responsibility for any breaches of confidentiality that may occur.

Link to this article:

Copyright (c) 2014 Jeffrey Dach MD All Rights Reserved
This article may be reproduced on the internet without permission, provided there is a link to this page and proper credit is given.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of significance. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

Serving Areas of: Hollywood, Aventura, Miami, Fort Lauderdale, Pembroke Pines, Miramar, Davie, Coral Springs, Cooper City, Sunshine Ranches, Hallandale, Surfside, Miami Beach, Sunny Isles, Normandy Isles, Coral Gables, Hialeah, Golden Beach ,Kendall,sunrise, coral springs, parkland,pompano, boca raton, palm beach, weston, dania beach, tamarac, oakland park, boynton beach, delray,lake worth,wellington,plantation

Last updated on by Jeffrey Dach MD

Cholesterol Lowering Drugs for the Elderly, Bad Idea
Article Name
Cholesterol Lowering Drugs for the Elderly, Bad Idea
Statins reduce all-cause mortality in elderly patients and the magnitude of this effect is substantially larger than had been previously estimated.
Jeffrey Dach MD
publisher logo

About Jeffrey Dach MD

Medical Director of TrueMedMD, a Clinic in Davie Florida specializing in Bioidentical Hormones and Natural thyroid. Office address 7450 Griffin Road Suite 190, Davie, Florida 33314 telephone 954-792-4663

6 thoughts on “Cholesterol Lowering Drugs for the Elderly, Bad Idea

  1. Pingback: Familial Hypercholesterolemia and Statin Drugs by Jeffrey Dach MD - Jeffrey Dach MD

  2. Pingback: How to Reverse Heart Attack? - Dr. J.

  3. Pingback: 39 Reasons to Avoid Bypass and Stenting - Jeffrey Dach MD

  4. Statins are not a good idea for ANYONE! They fail 99% of the time to have any effect on C-V disease and have over 300 documented unwanted direct effects. They actually promote the progression of atherosclerosis by increasing arterial calcification. This is a direct effect of statins interfering with normal Vitamin K metabolism. They also cause or aggravate Type II diabetes, which is another risk factor for heart attack, stroke as well as many cancers. The NNT (number needed to treat) to prevent a heart attack in primary prevention studies is 200! That means the other 199 have no benefit AND are at higher risk of incurring many statin-induced “side effects” including congestive heart failure, cataracts, peripheral neuropathy, muscle and joint aches and pains, cognitive dysfunction, memory loss, etc, etc. Taking a statin drug is a REALLY BAD IDEA PERIOD!

  5. Here’s one real life story about how the statins do more adversely affect the advanced elderly:

    While knowing for a long while how risky the statins are, I provided primary advocacy for my dad (94), but was not as able to intervene for his wife (91) which meant that, via her doctor’s recommendation she agreed to go on Vytorin which is a combo of two types of statins. Although she was taking the CoQ10 I recommended ‘must’ be used when on a statin, since this heart protective antioxidant/nutrient is also depleted in the same biochemical pathway where cholesterol is produced, I repeatedly counseled her against the statin (because of advanced age) but she was too intimidated by the white coat authority to discontinue on her own and so, by one year out, she was all the more so suffering from unexplained fatigue, worse insomnia and daytime sleepiness. Plus, only two weeks before she went down with first-ever Stress-induced Cardiomyopathy (aka Tako Tsubo, Broken Heart Syndrome)…so was she found with blood glucose of 54 (too low) which was indicative of hypoglycemia (very petite, didn’t eat enough) but for which her secondary doctor only suggested that she “Go home and drink more orange juice.”

    For those who may not know, Stress-induced Cardiomyopathy is becoming more known in post-menopausal females who no longer have as much heart-protective estrogen coursing through their bodies and although this event can be just as lethal as the more typical heart attack caused by build-up of plaque in coronary arteries, this other is akin to a ‘spike in Adrenaline’ and other pro-inflammatory agents called Catecholamines that biochemically ‘stun’ the heart, even to extent that the abnormal reaction (includes “ballooning” or irregular expansion in heart muscle) can either disrupt the heart rhythm or cause it to stop altogether. Therefore, she was resuscitated twice by the EMT’s with the first while still at the bowling alley and a second in the ambulance before reaching the hospital. When I was called (lived 100 miles away), the consensus was that she was dying so I’d “better hurry.” As it turned out, though, she made it through that first night and by the fifth day I went home with her to provide recovery care and watch over my dad who dealt with mobility issues.

    But what is ‘most telling’ as pertains to Dr. Dach’s article focus…is that when I soon felt a need to call the Cardiologist due to the array of adverse effects my loved one was having from the single drug he’d put her on (a BB which dampens Adrenaline which she did not need by then in order to heal), he proceeded to tell me she had been a most interesting case in that when he performed the diagnostics to see where her blood levels of cholesterol were, there was absolutely none to detect which, in turn, prompted a second look…only to still not find even a trace of (essentially protective) cholesterol in this 91 y/o woman’s body…so, no wonder she was steadily doing so poorly and eventually suffered such life-threatening event; especially when low blood sugar is factored in.

    As my investigation confirmed back then (2008) there are researchers who believe that such ‘stunning’ event is more prevalent in postmenopausal females, not only because of lower estrogen, but also due to fairly frequent status of the roller coaster effect being imposed on the heart and brain which is about either high to low or low to high surges of glucose and for which they suggest may be better classified as Diabetes lll.

    Then, other findings include that, unlike the longer recovery periods with typically plaque-related heart attacks, this other saw my family member (albeit, after benefit of adequate nutrition, lots of rest and time enough for heart to return to normal size) bounce back by three (3) weeks which was when the Cardiologist did an ECHO and by evidence of restored ejection fraction, then declared, “You now have the heart of an 80 y/o.” However, while this was the good news for her physical acuity, there had been enough damage done to the brain (due to ‘both’ statin exposure and later acute event) which has, ever since, significantly compromised her short term memory.

    As I say, this was in 2008…and by now, after my dad’s death and I am no longer involved in this woman’s care (has three sons), and don’t think she’s back on a statin…she is actively engaged in the safety and proper food oversight of Assisted Living…and with as much cholesterol surging as her dear body can produce, it will be this December that she (even) celebrates her 100th birthday.

  6. Pingback: Statin Choir Boy Turns Disbeliever

Leave a Reply